key point meaning in Hindi

Examples

1. It does not describe the law in detail , but it does list the key points .
   यह कानून का विस्तृत वर्णन नहीं करता है,पर उसके मुख्य बिन्दुओं की सूची अवश्य ही प्रस्तुत करता है |भाष्;
2. _________ Jan. 17, 2006 update : It was Christian W. Troll, SJ, who explained Fazlur Rahman's thinking at the seminar mentioned above. In a note replying to my article, Dr. Troll replies to Father Fessio's account of the discussion, disagreeing with a key point in it:
   17 जनवरी 2006 अपडेट - उपर्युक्त सेमिनार में Christian Troll ने फजलुर रहमान के विचार की व्याख्या की थी . मेरे लेख के जवाब में डॉ ट्राल ने फादर फेसियों के घटनाक्रम का विवरण देते हुए एक प्रमुख मुद्दे पर असहमति जताई है .
3. Mullahs chose to harm a weakened Democrat in 1980 and could do so again; or, they could decide that Obama is more to their liking and desist. The key point is, the troop withdrawal hands them extra options. Obama may well rue not having kept them there until after the elections, which would have allowed him plausibly to claim, “I did my best.”
   मुल्लाओं ने 1980 में कमजोर होते डेमोक्रेट को क्षतिग्रस्त किया था और वे इस बार भी ऐसा कर सकते हैं या फिर उन्हें यह लगे कि ओबामा उनकी रुचि के हैं और ऐसे किसी प्रयास से स्वयं को बचा लें। मुख्य बिंदु यह है कि सेना की वापसी ने उन्हें अतिरिक्त विकल्प दे दिया है। ओबामा को चुनावों के बाद तक सेना को रोकना चाहिये था ताकि बाद में वे आत्मविश्वास पूर्वक कह पाते कि “ मैंने वह सब किया जो कर सकता था” ।
4. Daniel Pipes responds: I thank Mark Perry for his reasoned response. The key point he makes is that Hamas “has never - not once - attacked or killed any Americans.” He is wrong; Hamas has killed a number of Americans in Israel . Further, he ignores the threat that its infrastructure in the United States poses, a topic I addressed the very day of his response, in “ Hamas vs. America .” Related Topics: US policy , War on terror receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.
   कन्फिल्कट्स फोरम और एलायंस फॉर सिक्योरिटी की ओर से मुझे लगता है कि हम अमेरिकावासियों को उन लोगों की हर संभव सहायता करनी चाहिए जो न्याय , शांति जवाबदेही और पारदर्शिता के हमारे मूल्यों पर अपने समाज को स्थापित करना चाहते हैं. हमास ने यह ऐतिहासिक चयन किया है .हम अपने भय के साथ भी बने रह सकते हैं या फिर हम नेतृत्व के साथ बातचीत कर निर्दोष लोगों की क्षति को रोक सकते हैं.
5. It is a curious fact, by the way, that Messrs. Lumelsky and Weingarten concur with the Islamists on the key point that militant Islam equals Islam, dismissing other approaches to the religion as inauthentic, insignificant, or otherwise irrelevant. I disagree, on the simple grounds that most Muslims reject militant Islam. George Jochnowitz makes the valid observation that nearly all Muslims subscribe to anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, and that true moderation requires that these be tamed, if not eliminated. I agree and note that, as so often in the past, attitudes toward Jews serve as a vital touchstone of moderation and decency. In this respect, moderate Muslims have nearly as far to travel as do their Islamist coreligionists. Related Topics: Radical Islam , War on terror receive the latest by email: subscribe to daniel pipes' free mailing list This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.
   सेमेटिक विरोध और उसकी संतान इजरायल विरोध अत्यंत शक्तिशाली है कि यह सभी सीमायें पार कर जाता है। नस्ली और मजहबी शत्रुता तो अत्यंत ही विनाशक है परंतु सेमेटिक विरोध तो विशेष रूप से खतरनाक है। यदि नरमनपंथी इस्लाम को राजनीतिक शक्ति बनना है तो इसे क्रांतिकारी इजरायलवाद विरोध से अलग करना होगा जिसके सम्बन्ध में यह शांत और नपुंसक है।
6. Dominate Egypt? If the military colludes with Islamists to remain in power, obviously it, and not Islamists retains ultimate control. This is the key point that conventional analysts miss: the recent election results allow the military to keep power . As aspiring Egyptian politician Mohamed ElBaradei correctly notes, “it is all in the hands of SCAF right now.” True, if Islamists control the parliament (not a sure thing; the military could yet decide to reduce their percentage in future rounds of an unusually complex voting procedure open to abuse), they acquire certain privileges and move the country further toward the Shari'a - as far, anyway, as SCAF permits. This maintains the long-term trend of Islamization underway since the military seized power in 1952. What about Western policy? First, press SCAF to build the civil society that must precede real democracy, so that the modern and moderate civilians in Egypt have a chance to express themselves. Second, instantly cease all economic aid to Cairo. It is unacceptable that Western taxpayers pay, even indirectly, for Islamizing Egypt. Resume funding only when the government allows secular Muslims, liberals, and Copts, among others, freely to express and organize themselves. Third, oppose both the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafis. Less extreme or more, Islamists of every description are our worst enemies. Mr. Pipes ( www.DanielPipes.org ) is president of the Middle East Forum and Taube fellow at the Hoover Institution. Ms Farahat is an Egyptian activist and co-author of a book about the Tahrir Square protests. A man walks by a graffito that proclaims “No to military rule,” crosses out a picture of military dictator Mohamed at-Tantawi and calls him a “fag.” Dec. 6, 2011 addendum : The text above refers to the USSR but Russia held elections two days ago that the U.S. secretary of state denounced for their “electoral fraud and manipulation.” At least they don't insult everyone's intelligence with 99-percent results. Egypt's military rulers said Wednesday that they would control the process of writing a constitution and maintain authority over the interim government to check the power of Islamists who have taken a commanding lead in parliamentary elections.
   मिस्र पर नियंत्रण? यदि सेना सत्ता में बने रहने के लिये इस्लामवादियों के साथ समझौता करती है जो कि ऐसा करेगी और इस्लामवादी अंतिम रूप से पूरा नियंत्रण स्थापित नहीं करते। यह मुख्य बिंदु है जिसे कि परम्परागत विश्लेषक भूल जा रहे हैं: हाल के चुनाव परिणाम से सेना को सत्ता पर नियंत्रण का अवसर मिलता है। जैसा कि मिस्रके उदीयमान राजनेता मोहम्मद अल बरदेयी ने सही ही कहा है, “ अभी तो सब कुछ एससीएसएफ के हाथ में है”।